AQTF Audit Information
Summary of AQTF audit information
Initial Audit Report: Audit report Training For Trees Pty Ltd (emailed)
As a Pre-qualified Supplier under the User Choice 2016 – 2017 program, Training For Trees Pty Ltd is required to publish audit information in relation to it’s compliance with the Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF).
The User Choice program provides public funding paid directly to Pre-qualified Suppliers for the delivery of accredited entry-level training to eligible Apprentices and Trainees.
The AQTF is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent, high-quality training and assessment services for the clients ofAustralia’s vocational education and training system.
An AQTF audit reviews evidence of an organisations’ compliance with the requirements of the AQTF Essential Conditions and Standards of Initial/Continuing Registration to confirm that it is achieving quality training and assessment outcomes. The process also identifies opportunities for improvement on these outcomes.
This information is published to assist apprentices, trainees and their employers to make informed decisions regarding their selection of a Pre-qualified Supplier for the delivery of training and assessment services.
Audit Date: 27/07/2012
Qualifications audited
|
Qualification code |
Qualification name |
|---|---|
| AHC20410 | Certificate II in Horticulture |
| AHC20510 | Certificate II in Arboriculture |
| AHC30810 | Certificate III in Arboriculture |
| RTF20203 | Certificate II in Horticulture (Arboriculture) |
| RTF30203 | Certificate III in Horticulture (Arboriculture) |
Audit Outcome
|
Was non-compliance identified? |
If ‘Yes’, non-compliance type |
Summary of non-compliance |
|---|---|---|
|
Yes/No |
Minor, Significant, Critical |
Yes/No |
NO
Explanatory notes: Non-compliance with the AQTF means that requirements of the have not been met based on the evidence reviewed. Non-compliances are categorised as minor, significant or critical. For the purposes of the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, only significant and Critical non-compliances need to be published
Minor: The evidence reviewed indicates that the requirements of the VET Quality Framework have not been met but there is minimal or no serious adverse impact on learners and /or persons affected by the outcomes of the training and assessment service provided.
Significant: The evidence reviewed indicates that the requirements of the VET Quality Framework have not been met and there are indications of a serious or potentially serious adverse impact on learners and /or persons affected by the outcomes of the training and assessment service provided.
Critical: The evidence reviewed indicates that the requirements of the VET Quality Framework have not been met and there is an actual or potential critical adverse impact on learners and /or persons affected by the outcomes of the training and assessment service provided.